Legendary actor Morgan Freeman, renowned for his commanding screen presence and iconic voice, has once again sparked debate with his outspoken views on Black History Month. In a recent interview with Variety on June 15, Freeman expressed his strong opposition to the annual observance, arguing that American history as a whole should be recognized rather than singling out the contributions of any particular group. His stance resonates with many who believe in fostering a unified national identity rather than emphasizing separate historical narratives.
Freeman, now 87, has made significant contributions not only as an actor but also as a producer. His latest project, The Gray House, co-produced with Lori McCreary, delves into the American Civil War and the crucial role played by three women whom General Ulysses S. Grant credited with helping the North win the war. This project underscores Freeman’s broader perspective on history—one that integrates all contributions into the collective American story rather than isolating them into separate categories.
When asked about Black History Month, Freeman did not hold back. “I detest it,” he stated bluntly. “The mere idea of it. You are going to give me the shortest month in a year? And you are going to celebrate ‘my’ history?! This whole idea makes my teeth itch. It’s not right.” His frustration is clear—he rejects the notion that black history should be confined to a single month when it is an integral part of the broader American experience.
Freeman further emphasized that his history is, first and foremost, American history. “It’s the one thing in this world I am interested in, beyond making money, having a good time, and getting enough sleep,” he said. His perspective aligns with those who advocate for an inclusive, holistic approach to history, rather than one that compartmentalizes the past based on racial or cultural distinctions.
In his remarks, Freeman also warned about the dangers of neglecting history. “If you don’t know your past, if you don’t remember it, you are bound to repeat it,” he cautioned. This sentiment echoes a long-standing belief that understanding history in its entirety is crucial to preventing the mistakes of the past. Rather than emphasizing fragmented historical narratives, Freeman argues for a comprehensive approach that acknowledges all contributions within the broader American experience.
Beyond history, Freeman also reflected on the entertainment industry, drawing parallels between Hollywood’s cyclical nature and historical recognition. “Do you know this song? ‘To everything, there is a season.’ It really, really works in showbusiness. You are trying to sell something 15 years ago and nobody even looks at you. Then they go: ‘Didn’t you have a project, some time ago? Do you still have it?’ Life is like that, in this industry,” he observed. His perspective highlights how timing and societal attitudes influence which stories get told and how they are received.
Discussing The Gray House, Freeman pointed out its inclusive approach to history. “It’s so wide-ranging. There are so many people in the series, because we are acknowledging they were there. If you can do that, if you are given space to do that, bravo. It didn’t just happen to one group of people,” he explained. This reinforces his belief that history should not be selectively told but rather presented as a collective narrative.
Lori McCreary, Freeman’s co-producer, expanded on the show’s treatment of slavery, a crucial aspect of the Civil War era. “We are not white-washing, we are not sugar-coating the fact that African Americans were enslaved. They weren’t treated as a full person. When you come out of watching these eight hours, maybe you will look at someone who looks like Morgan or me differently. You will understand their experience, their ancestors’ experience, and you will be able to relate,” she stated.
Freeman’s comments on Black History Month have reignited discussions about how history should be recognized and taught. His perspective challenges traditional approaches, urging society to embrace a more unified, all-encompassing narrative. Whether one agrees or disagrees with his stance, his words have undoubtedly sparked meaningful dialogue about the way history is remembered and celebrated.
As the conversation around historical recognition continues, Freeman’s perspective serves as a reminder of the broader debate on how history should be taught and acknowledged. His remarks encourage deeper reflection on the importance of inclusivity in historical narratives, challenging society to reconsider the way it honors its past.